According to media reports controlled by the Communist Party, the law is expected to criminalize crimes such as splitting the country, subverting the central government, terrorism, and collusion with foreign forces. However, a few hours after the report was adopted, the details were still vague, limiting a particularly opaque process, which analysts and activists speculated.
At a weekly press conference on Tuesday morning, New York City leader Carrie Lam initially refused to answer questions about the law, saying it was “not suitable for me to comment.” A few hours later, she later defended it in a video speech by the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva, saying that it would restore stability and prosperity to Hong Kong.
Her administration seemed to be almost completely cancelled, but it did not prevent them from predicting that the law would only affect a small number of people in the city and would not harm political freedom and judicial autonomy.
Lin said in a statement last week that the legislation would be “in accordance with the rule of law” and “applicable to the rights and freedoms of Hong Kong”.
If the new law follows the expected model of similar legislation in China, then according to the new law, such talk may be illegal. Huang, Luo and Zhou also actively participated in lobbying the international community to pressure Beijing and demanded that Hong Kong exert pressure on Hong Kong. Many people believe that Hong Kong is regarded as “collusion with foreign forces.”
Two other political parties, the Hong Kong National Front and student localist organizations, also said they are suspending their activities in Hong Kong, although both groups-marginal independent parties-have said they will continue to work overseas.
As we all know, some supporters of independence have fled Hong Kong in recent months, and they are worried about being arrested for violent anti-government protests that occurred frequently last year or upcoming laws. On Sunday, Wayne Chan, the convener of the Hong Kong Independent Alliance, confirmed that he had been released on bail and left the city. He has been facing charges related to the protest.
Pro-government groups and politicians welcome the passing of the law-the former leader CY Liang provided a reward for future prosecutions-many Hong Kong people are greatly frustrated by the continuing lack of details and know that the law has been passed, but feel almost in trouble, but this Does not mean anything.
Philip Dykes, chairman of the Hong Kong Bar Association, said in a letter to the Hong Kong government on Monday that the confidentiality of this law was “really extraordinary” and called on the government to specify how to guarantee the minimum rights of citizens.
This uncertainty may continue until Tuesday night, when the bill is finally expected to be published and gazetted. Regardless of how these crimes are described or what punishment is stipulated, many people will watch how police and prosecutors vigorously carry out these crimes.
The key test will be conducted on Wednesday, when Hong Kong will usher in the 23rd anniversary of Hong Kong’s return to Chinese rule. Traditionally, this is the day when anti-government marches through the city, but this year’s protests have been banned.
Organizers say they will continue to move forward. However, it remains to be seen how many people have joined their ranks and what crimes (if any) these people are considered to have committed.