Although the entanglement in North Sikkim was resolved locally, within the framework of the agreement between the two parties, the agreement in eastern Ladakh is still hovering, triggering speculation about China’s intentions.
At the strategic and operational levels, both military forces exercise restraint. However, at the tactical level, due to the fact that the LAC did not demarcate the boundary on the ground, but different views on where the actual boundary is, a confrontation occurred. Although the confrontation is resolved locally, the challenges associated with infrastructure construction (such as roads and fortifications) always take longer and require a combination of military and diplomatic initiatives.
During the coronavirus pandemic, China may not be able to withstand any adventurous adventures in the Himalayas in the face of numerous internal and external challenges. Conflict with India as its main regional strategic competitor will not only aggravate its problems, but will also seriously hinder its planned journey to becoming a global superpower by 2050. Some of the challenges facing Xi Jinping today include China’s economic contraction, trade wars again breaking out with the United States, the departure of some manufacturing industries, and the slowing down of the ambitious Belt and Road Initiative. Protests in Hong Kong, Taiwan’s stubbornness and global demands to explore its role in the coronavirus pandemic have also increased its predicament.
In addition, in addition to Pakistan being an all-weather strategic partner in the region, Beijing’s decisive manner and its so-called pandemic-related role have caused anti-Chinese sentiment in Asian countries as part of its containment strategy against India. Always be friendly with it. India will make good use of this advantage.
China is aware of the current fighting potential of the Indian army and has developed into a responsible, responsive and powerful national force on the disputed Himalayan border since the 1962 Sino-Indian conflict. The military forces of the two countries have jointly trained for many years to develop interoperability to carry out humanitarian assistance, disaster disasters and counter-terrorism operations. When both sides realize the severe consequences of the conflict, mutual understanding of each other’s military strength can help build mutual deterrence. Under the current political leadership, India has shown a tendency to use force when provoked. Cha Jam and Kashmir’s turbulent and complex proxy war arena further helped the Indian army fight to strengthen its soldiers.
Although the probability of conflict in the near future is very small, India must seriously continue to develop its military capabilities to stop aggression, and if it fails, it must fight to win the war in the country. Relying on any external force to print wars is certainly not a good idea. As a newly emerging power, India must adhere to its principle of adherence.
But in order to achieve greater economic and geo-strategic benefits, peaceful solutions are the answer. There is enough room in the world for these two Asian giants to grow at the same time.